[fitswcs] RADESYS = 'GAPPT'
Steve Allen
sla at ucolick.org
Wed Mar 16 15:43:32 EDT 2011
On Wed 2011-03-16T12:31:30 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ:
> Which is to say that I've had surreal conversations too many times
> about the "meaning" of RA versus TELRA versus the WCS keywords versus
> "reference pixels" versus...
The existing Lick Observatory FITS files contain CRVAL1 and CRVAL2
cards with meanings that correspond to no standard, but which are
essential for interpreting the pixels. Those cannot be idly removed.
I take both of the above as examples of the motivations Greisen and
Calabretta had when they provided us with 26 alternate WCS versions.
There is room for us all to append our own meanings, precise or not,
but there should not be room for debate on the intended interpretation.
I'm ruminating about best practices for existing systems and
engineering suggestions to include in subsequent ones.
--
Steve Allen <sla at ucolick.org> WGS-84 (GPS)
UCO/Lick Observatory--ISB Natural Sciences II, Room 165 Lat +36.99855
1156 High Street Voice: +1 831 459 3046 Lng -122.06015
Santa Cruz, CA 95064 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/ Hgt +250 m
More information about the fitswcs
mailing list