[evlatests] Switch Failure Statistics
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Tue Oct 25 10:42:42 EDT 2011
Although we have made the decision to replace the band switches, I
thought it might prove illuminating to do some basic statistics on the
failure rate from the observations taken Friday night.
I use as the metric of success or failure the smoothness and
continuity of the PDif values over the 7 hours duration of the
observations. Recall that I cycled around the eight frequency bands, at
a rate of roughly one change every minute -- each band was tuned 37
times, in the order: Cr -- C -- S -- Ku -- K -- Q -- Ka -- L -- X.
'Cr' stands for the referenced pointing tuning, which was at a different
pair of frequencies than the actual observation.
A simple table was constructed, comprising four columns for each
band and telescope -- the four columns are for the four IFs. An antenna
was declared 'unstable' if there was more than one clear deviation in
PDif from a smooth curve. (Usually, for those antenna with a single
deviation, it was the first observation -- something to do with setup
perhaps). I then counted the number of 'failures'. The distribution
with band is quite striking. The table below shows the number of
failures, and the fractional failure rate (since not all bands are
equipped on all antennas). For some bands, special situations were
observed, and these are in the 'Notes'.
Band Failures Fraction Notes
----------------------------------------------------------
L 10 9% Four of the
failures are with antenna 18 (all IFs).
S 5 7
C 5 4 Four of the
failures are with antenna 25. Note this band followed referenced pntg.
X 16 20 (BD side was
tuned to 11.2 GHz, so only wideband receivers are counted).
Ku 11 17
K 26 25 AC side fails much
more commonly (40%)
Ka 22 21 AC side fails more
commonly (31%)
Q 52 50% LCP fails much more
commonly (67%)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
'Failures' come in two flavors:
(a) A change in gain, but stable throughout a particular observation.
(b) A time-variable change, where the synchronous power (PDif) is
changing second-by-second, often not stabilizing at all during the
minute-long observation.
The good news is that in nearly all cases, the detected change in
PDif is reflected in the visibilities, and application of the switched
power (mostly) restores the proper amplitudes. There are some notable
exceptions, where application of apparently useful PDif data greatly
worsens the visibility data. I'll report on this next.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list