[evlatests] EVLA antenna polarization at L, S, C, and X bands
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Wed Mar 16 13:57:31 EDT 2011
The data from the 'receiver rotation' experiment are now calibrated
and reduced. The essential results are given below.
L-Band.
Five antennas are equipped with the fully EVLA compliant receivers
and polarizers (6, 10, 12, 20 and 26). For these, the antenna
polarizations easily meet the EVLA goal of 5% cross-polarization (D-term
amplitude), across the entire 1 -- 2 GHz passband.
S-Band.
Four antennas are equipped with the new-design quadrature hybrids,
the rest are outfitted with the old design. The new design systems
easily meet the cross-polarization goal over all frequencies. Antennas
with the old design hybrids exceed the EVLA goals at the low end, from
2000 to 2500 MHz.
C-Band.
The new-design hybrids are not yet ordered, so all antennas are
equipped with the old design. The antenna polarizations are highest at
the low frequency end, and exceed the EVLA goal of 5% below 5 GHz.
Most antennas meet the 5% goal between 5 and 8 GHz.
X-Band.
Five antennas are now equipped with the new wide-band X-band systems
(6, 7, 14, 16, and 24). For three of these antennas, the
cross-polarization meet the 5% goal between 8.25 and 12 GHz. The
remaining two exceed the level at the extreme ends (below 8.75 and above
11.5 GHz). The origin of this is in the wideband phase shifter.
The overall performance is fine, but it is interesting to note that
the old (narrowband) receivers had far better (lower) cross-polarization
-- typically 1 to 2% between 8 and 8.5 GHz). The higher
cross-polarization of these wideband receivers is the price we pay for
full-band coverage. As always, it is more important that the
cross-polarization be stable than it be low, since the former permits a
post-correlation correction.
A full report will be issued later via the Memo series -- but must
await Eric's return from vacation in order to sort out a few problems
with the 'TRUEP' program.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list