[evlatests] Quick EVLA System Check
Bryan Butler
bbutler at nrao.edu
Mon Feb 5 15:12:17 EST 2007
i might suspect secondary referenced pointing. we have not (as far as i know)
tested that mode very rigorously. you might try the experiment again only using
primary reference pointing to see what happens (if there is some free time on
the array soon).
-bryan
On 2/5/07 12:44, Rick Perley wrote:
>
> Primary referenced pointing was used at C, X, and K bands.
> Secondary reference pointing (with X-band as primary) was used for Q-band.
>
> Results:
>
...
> K-Band.
>
> Completely bizarre results -- for *both* the EVLA and VLA.
> Antennas 16, 17 and 24 are out, as noted above.
> All othres -- including all VLA antennas -- gave very weak fringes.
> The bandpass solutions showed IFpair 1 (IFs A and C) to have an
> effective bandwidth of ~5 MHz, centered on channel 8. IFpair 2 (IFs B
> and D) showed normal bandwidth, but were very noisy.
> The antenna gain program CALIB failed on nearly all antennas, both
> IFpairs.
>
> Q-band.
>
> The same as K-band -- only weaker. Bandpass solutions had the same
> characteristics as at K-band. No antenna calibration was possible --
> insufficient SNR.
>
> Something very wrong here ...
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
More information about the evlatests
mailing list