[daip] 31DEC13, NOIFS problem

[Eric Greisen]

On 07/08/2016 03:34 AM, 정다운 wrote:
> Good morning.
>
> I discussed with my advisor about NOIFS. He concluded that in my
> research NOIFS does not matter considerably.
> For now, I will proceed to do my research without NOIFS.
> However, I am still curious about the NOIFS problem.
> So, I am wondering whether you have solved NOIFS problem and if you
> solved the problem, I want to do my research including NOIFS procedure.
>

Does NOIFS at your site do this on the data set you made available to 
me?  Because, on that data set, it works just fine here.  There is 
little I can do in that case unless you get me a data set that NOIFS 
fails on here.

I would think that running the correction task one IF at a time would 
actually be better.  The correction is a continuum one, so breaking it 
into pieces would make the correction track the actual frequency 
differences better.

I will be away on vacation July 11-16 but will be happy to work on this 
further when I return.

ERic Greisen