[daip] UVFLG suggestion

[Jim Ulvestad]

This is very cool, once I understood what DOINV was,
it worked great.  Muchas gracias.

Jim

Eric Greisen wrote:
> Jim Ulvestad writes:
>
>  > May not be so easy, but it would be really nice if UVFLG
>  > (and even QUACK) had the following options for antennas
>  > and baselines, given a particular time range, IFs, etc.
>  > 
>  > (1) Flag all EVLA-EVLA baselines
>  > (2) Flag all EVLA-VLA baselines
>  > (3) Flag all VLA-VLA baselines
>  > (4) Flag any of the combinations of the above
>  > (i.e., 1 and 2, but not 3, or 1 and 3, but not 2, etc.)
>  > 
>  > Don't know if this is easy or difficult, but I suspect
>  > there are a lot of people who would (or will in the future)
>  > like to have this capability.
>  > 
>
> I have created 4 verbs VLA, EVLA, VLBA, HSA which place the
> appropriate list of antenna numbers on a POPS stack.  They all take
> the DOINVERS adverb so all can also do NOTVLA, NOTEVLA, etc.  Thus
> ANTENNAS = VLA; BASELINE = EVLA should do 2 above if DOINV=-1.
> Note that the = sign is required.  The grammar hole that allows it to
> be omitted is foiled by the verb nature of the new verbs.  This
> solution lets you use the concept wherever it might be useful.
>
> Eric Greisen
>