[daip] PCCOR question

[Leonia Kogan]

Dayton,

I have created the private version of PCCOR for you which copies 
real/image of your PC table into real/imag
of the output SN table. The Delay and Rate are equal zero at the output 
SN table.
I hope it is what you wanted originally. :)

You can pick up the files PCCOR.FOR, PCCOR.HLP, and PCCOR.OPT from my 
web site:
www.aoc.nrao.edu/~lkogan

These thre files are enough to create your private version of PCCOR.

Let me know if you do not know how to create the private version and how 
use it

Tell me please the result.

Leonia

Dayton Jones wrote:

>>Dayton,
>>
>>I have loadded your fits file in AIPS and printed out the PC table.
>>
>>I see now the format of your PC table: CABLE_CAL =0sec;  PC_FREQ=0Hz; PC_REAL, PC_IMAG= something
>>
>>It is very different of what I expected to see and very different of the standard PC table we obtain from VLBA correlator.  PCCOR uses usually more than one tone for each IF and uses the relevant frequencies for each tones.
>>I thoght that your cable delay is at the CABLE_CAL column of the PC table and thought about modification of the PCCOR to apply the CABLE_CAL column only.
>>
>>Now when I see the actual format I think it is not good idea to add the option in PCCOR for reading such an unusual PC table. PCCOR is very complicate task and reading the unstandard PC table like yours will require too much of modiification which will put PCCOR to far from the main pass of its using.
>>
>>I want to offer you to create SN table with your real and imag colums as the relevant column of the SN table.
>>
>>There are several ways to create it by hand: SNEDT, TBIN, TBOUT....
>>
>>Leonia
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>Leonia,
>
>If we were to convert the round-trip phase data into an equivalent
>delay, and put those values into the CABLE_CAL column of a PC table,
>would PCCOR be able to apply these corrections to the visibility
>phases even if there were no other data in the PC table?
>
>Cheers,
>        Dayton
>  
>