[daip] Re: UVFLG

[Jim Ulvestad]

I'm a bit worried that this is not the right thing to do.
I suspect that some users will try to flag with an infile
when they have left over parameters in APARM, and will
end up flagging lots of data by accident.  I prefer the
method where you make the user take two positive steps
to do the flagging, as long as we make it clear that 
this is what is needed.

Opinions?

jim

Leonia Kogan wrote:
> 
> Hi Lincoln,
> 
> I have put the new version of UVFLG in the system.  UVFLG flags now
> instructions given at INFILE together with elevation and pulse cal.
> Other instructions given at the input parameters (TIMERANG, BIF,
> EIF...) are ignored when INFILE presents.
> The relevant warning has been added. The help file has been modified.
> 
> Leonia
> 
> Subject: aips_gripe
> {19-APR-2001 14:15:59}
> {rgalp8       UN-REGISTERED!!!!!!!}
> {   24  31DEC01  DEC}
> {lincoln greenhill}
> {cfa}
> {617 495 7194}
> {UVFLG does not permit me to flag by INFIL and elevation in the same run.
>  I have verified that I can use two consecutive runs to achieve the
>  desired flagging.  When both things are requested, the elevation flagging
>  is not done.
>   }
> {When INFIL and elevation are specified to UVFLG, elevation flagging is not done}
> {greenhill at cfa.harvard.edu}
> { }