[daip] FILLM

[Eric Greisen]

Johan van der Walt writes:

 > What is the effect of choosing different averaging times? For continuum
 > emission what would a good choice? What is too short an averaging time
 > and what is typically too long? 
 > 
    I would guess that users normally do no averaging with FILLM.
Atmospheric phases changes, which get corrected by self-cal, are
washed out to the detriment of the data with any significant
averaging.

Eric Greisen