[alma-config] Fw: Set of imaging and UV results for C arrays on SIL images

[Steven]

Sorry folks, I sent this to the group from a non-member account, so here I
am trying again...

----- Original Message -----
From: Steven Heddle <heddle at totalise.co.uk>
To: Min Yun <myun at aoc.nrao.edu>
Cc: <alma-config at zia.aoc.NRAO.EDU>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 12:49 PM
Subject: Set of imaging and UV results for C arrays on SIL images


> Hello
>
> I have generated results for the C arrays applied to the 5 SIL images,
with
> the presentation modified to take account of the comments on the earlier
> trial page.The naming convention has been modified slightly so that the
> frequency encoded in the last two digits of the rootname of all the data
> files is represented by b7 (i.e. ALMA band 7) for 345GHz - I have prefixed
> the 7 with a b to still allow direct input of integer wavelengths in mm
when
> performing the simulations, and these would be represented as _1 for 1mm
> etc. The UV distributions are now shown on plots with axes the same size,
> although I have yet to find how to keep the bins in the histogram the same
> for each case. I cannot see a practical means of setting the max grey
scale
> values to useful standard levels given the dependences on all parameters,
so
> I have let them autoscale. The grey scale results are no longer shown in
> negative form.
>
> The results are presented on the web pages listed below (please use this
> message as an index till I write an actual index page)
> and are separated into pages showing UV results and pages showing imaging
> results.
>
> For the imaging results, there is a page per SIL image per configuration
> (i.e. A, C, or E) for snapshots and tracks separately. On each page the
> results for the K(ogan) and C(onway) results are shown side by side, and
> show contour plots of the the dirty map and grey scale plots of the dirty
> map for each of the declinations simulated, i.e. +25, -23 and -70.
> These pages are the first 10 in the list below- what you want from the
name
> is that it starts with IM, what image is being simulated (i.e. the name
> contains MAR, MPD, CYG, M51 or SDC) and whether it contains SN or _4
> denoting snapshot or 4 hour track respectively. Don't worry about the rest
> of the name.
>
> For the UV results, there is a page per declination per configuration (i.e
> A, C, or E) for snaphots and tracks separately. The results for the K and
C
> arrays are shown side by side, and show the UV distribution, histogram of
> baselines, contour plot to 10% of dirty beam, grey scale plot to 10% level
> of dirty beam (***NEW***), and four slices though the dirty beam at 0, 45,
> 90 and 135 degrees.
> These pages are the last 6 in the list below- what you want from the name
is
> that it starts with UV, what declination it contains (the +25, -23, or -70
> part), and whether it is snapshot or track (SN or _4). Don't worry about
the
> rest of the name. Honestly, you'll grow to love these names through
time...
>
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCCYGSN/IMxCCYGSN.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCCYG_4/IMxCCYG_4.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCM51SN/IMxCM51SN.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCM51_4/IMxCM51_4.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCMARSN/IMxCMARSN.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCMAR_4/IMxCMAR_4.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCMPDSN/IMxCMPDSN.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCMPD_4/IMxCMPD_4.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCSDCSN/IMxCSDCSN.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/IMxCSDC_4/IMxCSDC_4.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/UVxCM51SN+25b7/UVxCM51SN+25b7.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/UVxCM51SN-23b7/UVxCM51SN-23b7.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/UVxCM51SN-70b7/UVxCM51SN-70b7.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/UVxCM51_4+25b7/UVxCM51_4+25b7.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/UVxCM51_4-23b7/UVxCM51_4-23b7.html
> http://www.stevenheddle.co.uk/ALMA/SIL/UVxCM51_4-70b7/UVxCM51_4-70b7.html
>
> Having automated (to a large extent) the generation of the web pages as
well
> as the genartion of the results, I can basically have the same done for
the
> A and E arrays by Monday, if everybody is happy with this. My own thought
is
> that perhaps the grey scale images might benefit from a log rather than
> linear scale. Regarding composite arrays such as BnC etc. , I could more
> quickly simply generate the results for the B and D arrays if the layouts
> were available. I'll wait till tomorrow for feedback before proceeding
with
> A and E in any case.
>
> I'll put up the information about the parameters, batch files etc. when I
> recover the mental strength...
>
> Cheers,
>     Steven
>