[wfc] Vote Reminder

[Rob Seaman]

> please take a look at this and do send your vote in by Friday.

I vote yes.

The committee is to be commended for an excellent job.  The "response  
to comments" is a textbook example of how such should be handled and  
will prove a useful reference the next time the standard is tweaked.

That said, "once FITS, always FITS" is a very severe standard to meet  
and a number of the textual changes are technically unenforceable  
should challenges arise.  I suspect that no important challenges will.

Good job!

- Rob

Caveat:

I am concerned lest all future maintenance of the standard be handled  
by the convention registry.  Some additions, e.g., checksums, remain  
appropriate for the standard itself, not simply to be tacked on.  In  
particular, if all future FITS functionality is delivered as a  
"convention", the detailed textual editing just demonstrated will  
likely never be applied to these conventions.