[mmaimcal] [Almasci_chile] Some thoughts on ALMA calibrator sources

Al Wootten awootten at nrao.edu
Mon May 10 11:39:03 EDT 2010


Hi Anita

There is a wiki for discussion of the development of requirements for a 
calibrator database.  It should be a framework for pushing the 
discussion along--Jeff updated it in June of last year.

http://almasw.hq.eso.org/almasw/bin/view/Archive/AsaCatalogues

I'd suggest that to be a good place to put your draft for discussion.

The science group task assignments are at:
http://wikis.alma.cl/bin/view/AIV/ScienceGroupTaskAssignments
It looks like Stuartt is in SCO this week; you could chat with him and 
Richard and Rudiger, I'd suggest.

Clear skies,
Al

Anita M. S. Richards wrote:
> 
> Al et al.,
> 
> Some time ago I was asked by Andreas to produce a document on metadata 
> requirements for ALMA calibration sources, with a view (among other 
> things) to defining what information could be extracted from the 
> pipeline, as well as standardising descriptions of existing catalogues.  
> This was in parallel with some work for the VO on metadata requirements 
> for interferometry.
> 
> Anyway, I talked to some of the relevant people and produced a draft, 
> but I am very aware than I may not have foound all the relevant 
> material. Also I do not know where to go next with it.  Since I am in 
> Santiago this week and then at the OSF, if there is anyone who might 
> find this useful I can send them the draft and discuss what to do next?
> 
> thanks very much
> 
> Anita
> 
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dr. A.M.S. Richards, UK ARC Node, Room 3.135
> Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Alan Turing Building, University 
> of Manchester, M13 9PL
> +44 (0)161 275 4243
> and
> MERLIN/VLBI National Facility, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Cheshire SK11 
> 9DL, U.K. +44 (0)1477 571321 (tel) 571618 (fax)
> 
> "Socialism or barbarism?" Rosa Luxemburg (1915)
> 
> On Mon, 10 May 2010, Al Wootten wrote:
> 
>> Hi folks
>>
>> It is a good time to consider this subject again.
>>
>> As we discussed at the Dec 09 Sci IPT meeting the SPT survey sources
>> presented in:
>> http://arxiv.org/abs/0912.2338
>> support the predictions made in the numerous ALMA memos on the subject.
>>  The area surveyed was very limited but of course this is a dynamic
>> field with Planck and the SPT still exploring.
>>
>> I think sourceCatalog.py is a derivative of SMA and other catalogs but
>> ALMA is reaching the point where it can contribute usefully to compendia.
>>
>> There was a plan at some point for a comprehensive EVLA/VLB/ALMA catalog
>> but I do not know where that stands or whether ALMA needs an independent
>> initiative.  Temporal measurements are critical--certain SBs run in
>> March used calibrators which had worked well for the SMA but whose flux
>> had faded to uselessness even for the more sensitive ALMA 3-antenna 
>> array.
>>
>> Clear skies,
>> Al
>>
>> Harvey Liszt wrote:
>>> Something to keep boredom at bay. Attached.
>>>
>>> H
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mmaimcal mailing list
>>> mmaimcal at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/mmaimcal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Almasci_chile mailing list
>> Almasci_chile at lists.alma.cl
>> http://lists.alma.cl/mailman/listinfo/almasci_chile
>>




More information about the mmaimcal mailing list