[fitsbits] reopening of Public Comment Period on the compression conventions
Demitri Muna
demitri.muna at gmail.com
Thu Jan 14 15:32:18 EST 2016
Hi,
I don’t have any opinions on compression algorithms, but I want to note that I’m opposed to the FITS format supporting any lossy compression as part of the format. FITS should be archival, and I think that any lossy representation of data (e.g. a thumbnail) should be created outside of the file. Lossy algorithms can improve dramatically over time with the increase of CPU speed (see the ~50% space improvement from H.264 to H.265 for the same quality). Thumbnails are extremely cheap to create and cache and become cheaper to do so over time with faster I/O and CPU. It’s common in archives to have jpg files next to FITS files for this reason - I don’t see a benefit to building this into the format. Keep things light.
Cheers,
Demitri
_________________________________________
Demitri Muna
Department of Astronomy
Le Ohio State University
Home page: http://muna.com
My Projects:
http://nightlightapp.io
http://trillianverse.org
http://scicoder.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/fitsbits/attachments/20160114/12202258/attachment.html>
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list