[fitsbits] start of Public Comment Period on the INHERIT convention
THIERRY FORVEILLE
thierry.forveille at ujf-grenoble.fr
Tue Jun 30 22:38:45 EDT 2015
"Frank Valdes" <valdes at noao.edu> writes
----- Original Message -----
> P.S. I really don't like the suggestion that multiple "images", say
> traditional CCD images, which are related should be "packed in a single
> binary table".
>
The flip side is that doing that covers the need which you describe, and is
already fully part of the standard.
There is a non-trivial cost (in additional code in FITS readers that needs
writing and, more importantly, maintaining) to multiple solution to the same
problem, which I see as enough of a reason to say no to INHERIT.
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list