[fitsbits] start of Public Comment Period on CONTINUE Long Kwd convention
Erik Bray
embray at stsci.edu
Thu Jun 25 12:21:57 EDT 2015
On 06/25/2015 10:36 AM, Lucio Chiappetti wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, van Nieuwenhoven, Richard wrote:
>
>> Our users where wondering why so much of the comments is thrown away depending
>> of the length of the string.
>
> Hmm ... personally I've never been very keen about / interested in comments
> (partial exception when units are indicated in comments).
>
> For me comments are intended to be human-readable while keyword values are
> intended to be computer-readable. In generally my homegrown programs simply
> discard the comment part ...
For some users comments are important. Some observatories also have certain
local requirements for what comments are included in deliverable files.
Furthermore, some comments are meant to be computer readable as well--FITS
encodes the units of header values in comments, which can make a comment a very
important piece of data. Which of course is a shame because some software
thinks it can just blithely truncate or ignore comments, when in fact they can
be a critical part of the data model (and in fact are not really comments at all).
Erik
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list