[fitsbits] Question on angstrom and erg units in FITS standard
Lucio Chiappetti
lucio at lambrate.inaf.it
Wed Nov 5 04:34:12 EST 2014
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Arnold Rots wrote:
> I think the authors waffled on the issue, on purpose.
Can't remember whether it was done on purpose in FITS 3.0 or simply
inherited from the previous versions.
> There are three statements that are relevant here:
> 1. FITS writers *should* use the IAU recommended SI units
> 2. Angstrom and erg are *deprecated in the IAU list*
> 3. Angstrom and erg are in a list of *allowable units*
> My interpretation is that Angstrom and erg are not deprecated in FITS,
> but neither are they on the preferred list of units: the combination of
> the three statements says that they are allowable, but you *should* not
> use them (i.e., less strong than deprecated),
Given that there is no such thing as an "authenticated interpretation"
my interpretation agrees with Arnold's
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lucio Chiappetti - INAF/IASF - via Bassini 15 - I-20133 Milano (Italy)
For more info : http://www.iasf-milano.inaf.it/~lucio/personal.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do not like Firefox >=29 ? Get Pale Moon ! http://www.palemoon.org
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list