[fitsbits] Questions about the 'REFERENC' keyword.
Joe Hourcle
oneiros at grace.nascom.nasa.gov
Tue Jan 29 17:19:53 EST 2013
I had some questions about the REFERENC keyword:
http://archive.stsci.edu/fits/fits_standard/node40.html#SECTION00942320000000000000
REFERENC Keyword
The value field shall contain a character string citing a reference
where the data associated with the header are published.
I could see a few different interpretations of this:
1. It's similar to the 'FITS Serialization' in VOTable, where you
don't have the data attached, and can instead give a URL:
http://www.ivoa.net/Documents/VOTable/20121205/votable.html#ToC36
(although, in this case, I don't know if the URL would go to a
complete FITS file, or the data portion without the HDU)
2. A URL to the archive or repository are available to
download from
3. A reference (citation, URL, DOI or bibcode) to a published
research article that uses the data.
4. A URL to a website with documentation on using the
data
So, question 1 : Which one is it intended to be used for?
The only real-world examples that I've managed to find so far is
WMAP LAMBDA, which seems to use it for a mix of 2, 3 & 4... but I don't
know that it's valid to define it multiple times:
http://lambda.gsfc.nasa.gov/product/map/dr5/templates_fitshdr.cfm
And GOODS/FORS2, which gives a bibcode for the first results paper:
http://archive.eso.org/cms/eso-data/eso-data-products/data-submission/spectrum-header.html
And question 2 is only partially related :
As it doesn't seem to be used for use #1, is there some standard way of
providing a complete HDU with some reference to data that's not attached?
I have some scientists who would like to review if the data's what they
want *before* they download really large files ... and I'd rather use
something FITS HDU-like, so they hopefully don't have to modify their
existing tools as much.
-----
Joe Hourcle
Programmer/Analyst
Solar Data Analysis Center
Goddard Space Flight Center
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list