[fitsbits] DATE-OBS versus TIME-OBS
Steve Allen
sla at ucolick.org
Tue Jan 22 17:32:12 EST 2002
On Tue 2002-01-22T21:54:32 +0000, William Thompson hath writ:
> How are other groups handling this?
snips from the header of our soon-to-deliver instrument
DATE-OBS= '2002-01-04'
UT = '13:11:43.12'
DATE_BEG= '2002-01-04T13:11:43'
DATE_END= '2002-01-04T13:11:44'
The explanation for this is that DATE-OBS and UT are traditional
keywords which are generated by an existing system that provides date
only and time only. Our traditional usage of DATE-OBS provides no
more precise a definition of its meaning than was in the original FITS
paper.
For the sake of better documentation we have coined the new keywords
which do have precise definitions and which are guaranteed to
correspond closely to the shutter action. Those use the new FITS date
format.
In particular, for our systems there has been no demand for the DATE
or UT values to correspond closely to the shutter action. The two
keywords may actually be queried on different sides of a day boundary
(albeit an unlikely event given the longitude of our telescopes). The
UT value may actually be outside the BEG-END range.
In effect, we deem DATE-OBS to be broken/deprecated and aren't
spending any engineering time fixing how we handle it.
--
Steve Allen UCO/Lick Observatory Santa Cruz, CA 95064
sla at ucolick.org Voice: +1 831 459 3046 http://www.ucolick.org/~sla
PGP: 1024/E46978C5 F6 78 D1 10 62 94 8F 2E 49 89 0E FE 26 B4 14 93
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list