units
Eric Greisen
egreisen at valen.cv.nrao.edu
Wed Apr 7 21:28:10 EDT 1999
Francois Ochsenbein writes:
> I just proofread the last version of table4 and there are just the
> following typos:
> => remove the dagger in front of u (unified atomic mass unit), and ph
> (difficult to envisage milli-photons...), and solMass (an error in
> my previous message, sorry...)
I was visualizing Mega photons - but maybe that's just wishful
thinking outside the radio range. Done
> => could add the dagger in front of mag (the millimag is used, but I don't
> know other multiples in use)
Done
> => the 26 exponent in the solLum definition is missing {}
Typos re exponents (several) were fixed today.
>
> Let me know whenever the Paper II is ready, I'm eager to read it !
So am I - I have seen bits of it and Mark is doing a wonderful
job.
>
> Thank you again, and sorry if my questions on units generated so
> many messages... but it helped to clarify the topic. I'm sure !
They have caused a better standard to be proposed and one that
unites two groups I hope. Your comments and repeated followups are
very much appreciated.
Thanks, Eric
More information about the fitsbits
mailing list