[evlatests] Subreflector motion errors
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Mon Nov 5 18:33:51 EST 2018
From the multi-band observation taken last Friday (17B-053), a
small number of subreflector motion failures were found. The failures
were only at X and Ku bands (with one single exception). Both focus and
rotation failures were noted. The details are::
1) The observations cycled through the bands in the following way
for each source. There were four sources.
Ku -> K -> Ka -> Q -> X.
For all, enough time was allocated to ensure the antennas were
on source for all observations.
2) Observations durations varied from 1 -- 2 minutes at X band to
up to six minutes at Q.
The failures noted were:
a) at X-band:
* ea15 failed to rotate the subreflector
to the correct position on three scans (out of 26). For one of these,
the subreflector reached the correct position 1.5 minutes late. This is
not a case of a slow motion -- the phases clearly show the motion
started 12 seconds before the subreflector reached the correct position.
* ea03 failed to change the focus on three
scans (not the same as the ea15 failures) from the Q-band position. For
one of these, the subreflector did reach the correct focus point one
minute after the scan began. Again, this is not a case of a slow motion
-- the phases clearly show the motion started six seconds before the
correct position was reached.
* ea11 failed to rotate the subreflector on
one scan (not the same as the preceding failures).
b) at Ku-band:
* ea05, 10, 11 and 25 all failed to rotate
the subreflector on one out of 26 scans. The failures were all on
different scans.
* ea05 also failed to change the focus
position (from X-band) on two scans (neither the same as the preceding
failures). For one of these, the subreflector reached the correct
position one minute late, and again, the phases show the motion started
5 seconds prior to reaching the correction position.
c) At Q-band:
* a single failure: ea05 failed to rotate
to the correct position.
At K and Ka bands, no subreflector motion failures were found.
A more exhaustive test (testing all band combinations) is probably
warranted, and has been proposed. Such a test would also test the
recent changes made to ea10's T303.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list