[evlatests] Delay/phase jumps on ea13 and 26 -- Sticky Subreflector!
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Fri Apr 13 17:27:50 EDT 2018
The cause of the 'jumps' seen in phase and delay on ea13 and ea26
is now known -- they are due to the subreflector moving late -- or not
at all -- following a change of band.
The X-band observations follow Ka-band, which thus necessitates a
small change in subreflector focus position. Review of the on-line flags
immediately showed that the subreflectors for these two antennas are
consistently late in completing the required motion.
The observed phase change (200 degrees) and delay change (40 ps)
are both consistent with a ~7mm change in subreflector position.
Examination of the phase plots shows that the problem is *not* that
the subreflector motion is slow, but rather that the command to move (or
the actual start of the movement) is late. In some cases, 'late' is
defined by more than 2 minutes (!), which is the length of the scan.
(In other words, there are some scans where the subreflector never moved
at all.
*The loss of data is quite large: For ea13, 40% of the data were
flagged due to this. For ea26, the fraction is 76%.*
There is evidence that, for ea13 at least, this problem has been
with us a long time. I have data dating from mid-2014 whose phase
solutions for ea13 show exactly the same phenomenology.
(For those who wonder why I'm looking at flagged data -- I wondered
why ea13 and ea26 had such a large fraction of the data flagged, when
the amplitudes looked perfectly fine. Unflagging these data uncovered
the effect).
I have not yet been able to examine the data from the other bands
(Ku, K, and Ka). This will be done shortly.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list