[evlatests] Tcal accuries at P-band
Frazer Owen
fowen at nrao.edu
Tue Sep 2 20:23:10 EDT 2014
The scatter is expected. Actually the scatter is pretty small. The
ability to measure the T_cals in the lab is limited. We needed to have
done this sort of on-the-sky calibration.
---Frazer
On 9/2/14 6:06 PM, Rick Perley wrote:
> A recent test at P-band observed both Cygnus A and some good
> calibrators (3C48 and 3C380). The primary goal was to test linearity
> of the system -- results for this will be presented later (but the
> news is very good).
>
> Here I report on the accuracy of the Tcal values.
>
> All antennas except ea13 and ea18 had good values of PDif. If the
> Tcal values are correct, and the efficiencies utilized are correct,
> the visibility data for the calibrators, following application of the
> switched power should equal the known source flux densities.
>
> For this test, I chose a single subband, at 312 MHz. (Reason --
> this subband had the least RFI). After basic editing, the switched
> powers were applied, and CALIB run on the two calibrators listed above.
>
> The mean solutions (for 'R' and 'L') were within 5% of 1.0. That's
> the good news.
>
> The not-so-quite good news is that there is a large scatter. Below
> are the CALIB gains needed to bring the data into alignment with the
> correct flux densities. Presuming the utilized efficiencies are
> correct, and are the same for every antenna, the error is in the
> values of the Tcals. The needed correction to the Tcal values is the
> square of the gain factor listed. Hence, if the gain factor is 1.1,
> then the Tcal value should be increased by 1.21.
>
> Antenna Gain Factor
>
> 1R 1.08
> 1L 1.07
> 2R 1.03
> 2L 0.87
> 3R 1.05
> 3L 0.95
> 4R 1.02
> 4L 0.75
> 5R 0.90
> 5L 0.86
> 6R 0.98
> 6L 1.06
> 7R 1.02
> 7L 0.92
> 8R out
> 8L out
> 9R 1.09
> 9L 0.84
> 10R 1.50
> 10L 1.30
> 11R out
> 11L out
> 12R 1.23
> 12L 1.36
> 13R no PDif
> 13L no PDif
> 14R 0.97
> 14L 0.72
> 15R 1.20
> 15L 0.84
> 16R 1.20
> 16L 0.95
> 17R 0.92
> 17L 1.00
> 18R 1.04
> 18L PDif broken
> 19R 1.08
> 19L 0.67
> 20R 1.10
> 20L 1.17
> 21R 1.14
> 21L 1.03
> 22R 0.94
> 22L 0.90
> 23R 1.05
> 23L 1.07
> 24R 1.12
> 24L 1.13
> 25R 1.27
> 25L 1.50
> 26R 0.90
> 26L 0.97
> 27R 0.93
> 27L 1.05
> 28R 0.93
> 28L 0.91
>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.nrao.edu
> https://listmgr.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
More information about the evlatests
mailing list