[evlatests] the P band polarization saga

Bryan Butler bbutler at nrao.edu
Wed Mar 12 16:48:10 EDT 2014



Bryan Butler wrote, On 3/12/14 14:44 :
>
> to prevent further confusion down the road, when we might have different
> engineers and software folks working with the system, mightn't it be
> better to actually make the cables match the intended scheme?
>
> i know that leaving it as is is the path of least resistance, but we
> might be avoiding some work now that would cause us more work in the future.

boy, is that some mangled english.  what i meant was we would be 
avoiding some work now *but* that might cause us more work in the future.


>
> i don't have a strong preference, i can just see us getting into trouble
> potentially because of this.
>
>
> Ken Sowinski wrote, On 3/12/14 14:39 :
>>
>> It is proposed that we simply define this as the connectivity and
>> do not try to make the system agree with previous documentation by
>> swapping cables in all the antennas.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>



More information about the evlatests mailing list