[evlatests] Bad TCal values for ea08 at X-band

[Barry Clark]

It is exactly a factor of 10.  The soida report for this receiver, and
this receiver only, has an extra column labeled "Tcal Scaled", which
is 10 times the Tcal column.  The parser was confused by the extraneous
column with the similar name.

I can fix this, but I can't think of a good way to document what
happened.  I'll probably just fix it, and leave the puzzle in case
anybody in the future wants to try to trace the footprints.

On 05/06/2013 04:36 PM, Rick Perley wrote:
>      The system temperature claimed by the system for ea08 at X-band is
> ten times too high.   The switched power values are perfectly  normal.
> Review of the 'CD' (Cal Device) table (in AIPS) shows the problem:
> The Tcal values for the 'A' and 'C' IFs are given as about 12K -- a
> factor of ten too high.  For the 'B' and 'D' IFs, the values are nearly
> as wrong -- declining from about 7K to 5K as the frequency increases
> (from 10.5 to 11.5 GHz).
>
>      These values need to be repaired.  It would also be useful to know
> where they came from.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests