[evlatests] Results from system sensitivity tests
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Tue Nov 15 11:20:36 EST 2011
A short script, run last week under excellent weather conditions,
allows a quick determination of system sensitivity. All the usual
calibration procedures were done. The SEFD values below are derived
both from natural-weight images of blank sky, (I used a single 2MHz-wide
channel from the center of each band) and from histograms of the noise
in various Stokes parameters. Except for L and S bands, these give
exactly the same results. For L and S bands, I use the histograms, as
the images are contaminated by the usual problems with uncleaned
sidelobes from far-away objects (especially notable when in D
configuration).
Band Freq Requirement Achieved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
L 1445 MHz 325 Jy 380
L 1820 325 440
S 2560 235 360
S 3520 235 250
C 4440 245 314
C 6626 245 250
X 8300 300 270
X 11300 300 260
Ku 13200 385 260
Ku 16800 385 285
K 19500 650 407
K 25500 650 485
Ka 29500 760 605
Ka 36500 760 840
Q 42000 1220 1250
Q 48000 2760 2820
-------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: Except for Q-band, the 'requirements' apply to mid-band. In the
Project Book, no attempt was made to account for varying Tsys and
antenna efficiency within the bands.
As has long been known, we are not meeting the sensitivity goals at
frequencies below ~ 6 GHz. The planned implementation of the new-design
thermal gap at C-band should improve sensitivity at the low end (4 -- 6
GHz) by 10% or more. I understand that a similar improvement at the low
end of L-band may be expected for the same reason. At S-band however,
this improved design is already implemented, so the high noise at 2560
MHz is in need of an explanation. We should do some holography scans to
look at the aperture illumination.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list