[evlatests] Results from 20-db LSC converter attenuator
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Thu Apr 14 18:11:37 EDT 2011
We ran the 'solar attenuator' test script on April 4. Stephen White
extracted the essential results, which I am only now able to review.
There are some 'interesting curiosities'...
To review: The test is quite simple:
Observe 3C84 and the sun at standard L, S, and C band frequencies.
For each, spend a couple minutes observing in normal ('cold sky') mode,
then turn on the 20-db solar attenuators, and watch the system react.
In principle (and in an ideal world), there should be a dramatic
factor-of-100 drop in power delivered to the samplers, which is restored
within a few seconds as the T304's attenuators react. The fringe
visibilities should be about the same in either state ( a couple of dB
different will be fine, as the switched power monitor should correct the
difference), as should be the calculated system temperature. (In fact,
because we have not any solar cals yet, the calculated Tsys, while on
the sun, will be only noise, as the regular cal will be swamped by the
sun's emission.)
What we saw:
A) L-Band
The total power (PSum) change while on 3C84 matches the
expectations: A dramatic drop, lasting three seconds, followed by a
rapid (1 or 2 seconds) rise to about the same level as before.
The behavior upon transition while on the sun is entirely
different! There is the drop as before, but instead of a rapid rise,
ther is (usually) a slow rise, lasting 20 seconds or more, culminating
in a power which is as much as six times the original value!! After
this, a dramatic drop to (about) the correct level is seen. For some
antennas, an entirely different behavior is seen, with a large up *up*
(rather than down), followed by a slow stepwise decline to the correct
level.
Why is the behavior while on the sun different? The actual power
level is the same (the solar power having been attenuated by the T304's
own attenuators). So how does the T304 'know' that the power it is
seeing is from the sun, rather than cold sky, and why is it reacting
differently?
The other curiosity is in the before/after values of Tsys, when on
3C84. Since the T304 and T302 should not add any appreciable noise, the
Tsys values should be mostly independent of the actual attenuator
setting. This is generally true -- but there are notable exceptions:
(All are in LCP, as these are the plots Stephen left for me):
ea15, Tsys doubled after transition (Tsys is higher with the 20 dB
T302 attenuator in).
For ea08 and ea24, there was also a rise, but by about 10%.
For all other antennas, the change was not perceptible.
B) S-Band
We would hope the behavior would be similar to that for L-band, but
we would be wrong in thinking it so ...
On 3C84, the power levels drop as expected, but rather than stay
there for 3 seconds (as at L-band), they typically stay there for 5 to
7 seconds, then jump back up to the more-or-less correct level.
The behavior on the transition while on the sun is generally similar
to L-band, except antennas which do not have the drop plus slow
rise/overshoot at L-band, do while at S-band, and vice versa.
The change in Tsys while on 3C84 is similar to L-band -- most
antennas return, some (like ea08) do not.
C) C-Band
The power transition while on 3C84 is like L-band: 3 or 4 seconds
down, then rapid return to expected levels.
The power transition while on the sun is generally like L and S
bands, but appears to be faster -- the 'slow rise' is terminated
earlier, with less overshoot.
The rise in system temperature upon transition on 3C84 is more
notable at C-band: Antennas with large (25% or more) changes include:
ea08, ea14, ea17, ea18, ea22, ea26. (Notable is that for ea15, which
doubled its Tsys at L-band, there is no perceptible change upon
transition at C-band).
Many thanks to Stephen, for his diligence in getting these plots out.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list