[evlatests] Switched Power Accuracy
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Tue Nov 2 17:40:22 EDT 2010
I may have been premature in my denunciations this morning of the
accuracy of the switched power correction scheme ...
Taking X-band for example, I have two calibrators, 3C286 and
J2007+4029. After standard point-source calibration, I noted that flux
ratio between these sources was different, by up to a few percent, with
different antennas. A simple list of which antennas have the ratio high
vs those who have it low showed a clear division by antenna distance
from the center -- i.e.: I've been misled by a resolution effect. And
indeed, 3C286 is partially resolved at this band, in this configuration.
Using the standard 3C286 model helped reduce the apparent
discrepancy, but didn't eliminate it. We could therefore have an
inaccurate model, or a real switched power problem, or something else...
A better test should use bona fide point sources. Another test,
which should be done with reasonably high priority, is to track one, or
perhaps two sources, for an extended period of time, looking for
periodicities in the switched/total power, and other 'odd, unexpected'
phenomena, preferably at a band where external effects like RFI are
minimized...
More information about the evlatests
mailing list