[evlatests] X-band subband ordering
Walter Brisken
wbrisken at nrao.edu
Fri Feb 19 19:53:54 EST 2010
Looking at some VCI documents with Adam earlier today we were surprised to
see LSB used for all bands where I would have thought X-band to need the
opposite sideband sense...
-W
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Rick Perley wrote:
> A quick perusal of X-band data shows that the ordering of the
> subbands is reversed:
>
> The correct spectral features (and continuity of phase) are
> recovered if the subbands are ordered {4,3,2,1}, rather than their
> current ordering {1,2,3,4}. Note that this is not the same as simply
> reversing the frequency axis. It appears the frequency ordering within
> each subband is correct (and runs 'backward').
>
> Data quality looks good, but a closer inspection is needed.
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
>
More information about the evlatests
mailing list