[evlatests] Results from 7.5 GHz tests
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Fri Jun 26 11:00:13 EDT 2009
Michael and Ken took a hour's data on 0217+738, using four sub-bands
centered at 7180, 7308, 7436 and 7564 MHz -- at the top end of C-band.
Only six of the 10 antennas connected to WIDAR have wide-band OMTs.
These are 2, 3, 9, 18, 24 and 28. The scans were all one minute long.
Removing the four unequipped antennas, and flagging the channels
corresponding to the big RFI birdie at 7273.5 MHz resulted in superbly
calibrated data. There are *NO* 180 deg phase flips, and *NO* 1 dB
attenuator changes.
The bandpasses were solved in the usual way, with one solution for
each 1-minute scan. Stability was excellent.
A 'pseudo-continuum' database was made by coherently summing over
950 channels, applying the bandpasses and gains.
UVFIX was needed to recover the (u,v,w), which mysteriously were all
set to zero. (Michael suspects something to do with the
autocorrelations being present in this database -- the first time this
has happened. The autocorrelation spectra all look quite correct.)
None of the oscillating amplitudes or phases which have plagued our
earlier C-band data were seen. But this should not be too great a
surprise -- all baselines which have shown this feature in the past are
formed from the four antennas removed from this database (not equipped
with wide-band OMTs).
An image was made with the six remaining antennas. The nearby
'lumpy' structure was noted, as usual. DR = 18,000.
BLCAL was run, with significant solutions, typically at the 0.1%
level.
The resulting image (with BLCAL applied) was fabulous -- dynamic
range of 80,000:1.
Thus, I conclude:
1) The oscillating phase/amplitude problem does not affect the DR.
2) The closure offsets seen at 4800 MHz are still with us at 7500
MHz, using the same receivers. They do not seem to be present in
X-band data at 8400 MHz.
3) These offsets do not significantly change over a time of one hour.
I'd like to see some L and K band data (taken in good weather for
the latter), of this source.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list