[evlatests] L-Band RFI
Dan Mertely
dmertely at nrao.edu
Wed Jul 15 17:38:52 EDT 2009
Hi Rick. I used the W8 monitor this morning to zero-in on
the 1200 -1400 MHz signals. I found the following:
FREQUENCY BW SNR(1) TYPE NOTES
(MHz) (MHz) (dB)
====================================================
1200.0 <0.001 10 Continuous LO birdie
1201.73 * 1 Continuous Unk
1209 8 3 Continuous 2 rounded humps
1227.5 1 varies Continuous GPS L2
1246.0 1 20 Pulsed TARS border radar?
1254.5 2 36 Pulsed FAA ARSR4, Deming?
1261.0 1 23 Pulsed Unk
1300.0 1 7 Pulsed FAA ARSR4, Gallup?
1310.0 3 30 Pulsed FAA ARSR4, ABQ
1320.0 0.5 23 Pulsed Unk
1330.0 5 31 Pulsed FAA ARSR4, ABQ
1337.0 2.5 37 Pulsed FAA ARSR4, Deming?
=====================================================
(1) SNR is power measured over *peak hold* noise level,
using 30 KHz RBW on the spectrum analyzer. The spectrum
analyzer is connected to the ant06 L-band front end output,
and with external gain, has "excess noise" over the spectrum
analyzer (native) noise level. These SNR readings then provide
a general measure of the power level above the nominal 35 Kelvin
noise temp at the output of the L-band front end. (Peak hold
readings add around 3 dB over average power readings.)
I also went to Ant09 to search for the 1408 birdie. It was
not found on either the LCP or RCP outputs of the L-band front
end. I then checked the IFA output of the T302 LSC converter
& saw it @ 1408 MHz (before I changed the spectrum analyzer to
look at the expected 8 - 12 GHz IF). At 1408 it was a CW, even
using 1 Hz RBW (1408.000123 MHz). SNR over peak hold noise level
was 14 dB. So, we're likely seeing some leakage of the 128 MHz
LO reference X 11.
The script "lband" was used to set-up the antenna. Looking at
the X-band output from the T302 LSC, it appeared that the LO was
at 12928 MHz, making 11928 MHz = 1 GHz sky frequency & 10928 =
2 GHz sky frequency. If that is true, I did see the 1408 MHz
birdie @ 11520 MHz (12928 - 1408). SNR over peak hold noise
was 6 dB (100 KHz RBW). SNR over 100 sweep averaging noise level
was 10 dB (100 KHz RBW).
-Mert
Rick Perley wrote:
> A new observation at L-band gave me some decent looks at our current
> environment. A few interesting issues ...
>
> 1) Radar signals are easy to identify because of their regular
> pulsing (really cool to see in SPFLG!). We have radar signals at:
>
> 1254.5, 1300.0, 1310.0, 1320.0, 1330.0, and 1338.0 MHz. The signals
> at 1300, 1320, and 1338 are very weak. None of these will cause any
> future troubles, as they are nowhere near strong enough to contaminate
> adjacent channels (after Hanning-like smoothing). Zap the affected
> channel, and move on ...
>
> 2) In the past we've had *huge* signals, very wide in frequency,
> centered near 1245 MHz. These are definitely not radars. However, in
> this new observation, these are virtually absent.
>
> 3) The entire band between 1929 and 1989 MHz is occupied with what I
> believe are cell emissions. (Dan -- is this right?) In the more
> distant past (a couple years ago), these were entirely open. The
> signals are quite strong. Pity.
>
> 4) The two 128-MHz-wide bands centered at 1435 and 1820 MHz are
> almost entirely free of RFI.
>
> 5) The internal 1408.0 MHz birdie, reported on a few days back, is
> still with us, with the same characteristics as reported earlier.
>
> Rick
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
More information about the evlatests
mailing list