[evlatests] More on current L-band from yesterday
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Wed Jul 15 13:26:40 EDT 2009
As noted by Ken, a short run was made yesterday, with the variant
antennas 25 and 28 removed, and the newly available antennas 4 and 8
in. The script was the same as Sunday's data: 1m20 second scans on
the northern calibrator 0217+738, with offsets of 5, 10, 15 and 20
arcminutes. The observations were the the late afternoon, and the
source elevation was very low -- about 25 degrees. (If subsequent tests
will be done in afternoon/evening, we need to select a new object).
Antenna 8 has no L-band feed. Antenna 4 fringed nicely.
Delays (w.r.t. ea01) are small, except for antenna 4: +47 nsec.
Data quality appears excellent, with essentially no flagging needed,
other than at the beginning of each scan.
The 180 degree 'phase hops' are back! This is the first time (that
I know of) that these have been found to occur for scans longer than 1
minute. Hopping antennas are: 2, 4, 18, 19, and 24. Non-hoppers are
1, 3, 9, and 23. (As usual, we can't tell which set hops and which does
not). Phase hops do not occur on an ~11 minute grid, either. As
always, all sub-bands hop by the same amount (180 deg) at the same
time. The time ranges within the hops occurred at: (uncertainties due
to off-source observing):
21:00:17 and 21:01:38
21:02:57 and 21:04:19
21:05:36 and 21:06:58
21:13:39 and 21:15:01
21:21:42 and 21:23:04
21:24:21 and 21:25:43
21:35:04 and 21:36:24
21:37:43 and 21:39:05
21:45:46 and 21:47:07
I followed the usual calibration route (BPASS, CALIB, CLCAL), and
made images of the on-source object. No background sources are seen,
and the usual lumpy artefacts dominate. Because of all the phase
hopping, I did not attempt to image the off-axis positions. As
reported earlier, there was with this observation some issues with the
SDM, which might have affected the apparently good data.
I think a new observation, at high elevation, with all 12 antennas,
and with all known bugs repaired, is warranted. I suggest 3C147
(0542+498), as a strong source calibrator. We'll also need a nearby
weak source, to reveal background structure.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list