[evlatests] Baseline labels are OK

[Vivek Dhawan]

Hi,

I was thinking along the same lines as the Ken/Michael test below -
they show that amplitudes are assigned to the correct baselines - I
was thinking of applying a different delay to each station and looking
at the baseline cross-power slopes to check if the phases on (some)
baselines were flipped. would work with rates as well. Michael -
is it worth trying?

On Thu, July 2, 2009 1:54 pm, Rick Perley wrote:
|     Thus, I conclude:
|
|     1) There is good evidence we have a phase convention backwards.
|     2) It seems less likely that we have scrambled the visibilities
| amongst the baselines.

|
|
| Michael Rupen wrote:
|> Ken and I observed a strong source with WIDAR this morning at C band,
|> using our standard WIDAR-0 setup, but strongly attenuating the signal
|> from each WIDAR antenna in turn, for one minute each (i.e., 1 minute with
|> ant 1 dead; 1 min with ant 2 dead; etc.).

|> Both the lag frames (blf) and the data passed through to AIPS accurately
|> reflect the changing attenuation on all baselines.  Thus the labelling of
|> the antennas/baselines is correct.