[evlatests] Which antennas should we connect to WIDAR-0?
Michael Rupen
mrupen at nrao.edu
Wed Feb 25 11:14:51 EST 2009
Hello folks --
Brent will be here Monday to bring up WIDAR-0, so it's time to
decide which antennas should be connected to WIDAR-0.
* We will initially have 7 antennas hooked up, in single pol'n mode.
- We may be able to hook up another antenna next week, for a total of 8.
- Further antennas require (1) refurbishing Station Boards from the PTC,
and (2) installing deformatters in those refurbished StB. The number of
deformatters will probably limit us to 9 rather than the originally
planned 10 antennas, though this is not absolutely certain yet.
My current guesstimate is that we'll have 9-antenna capability around
the last week of March.
* Four of the initial WIDAR-0 antennas should be ready for 3-bit samplers.
That means four of antennas {2, 3, 5, 9, 28, 15}.
* When we switch to full pol'n mode (i.e., both RR & LL from each antenna)
using the 8-bit samplers, we'll have half as many antennas (rounded up --
for these purposes, half of 7 is 4, and half of 9 is 5). We will also
have to move some fibers around. Switching fibers within a rack
is easy, while switching fibers *between* racks is much more painful.
So, we'd like our five-antenna subset to consist of:
two of the four antennas normally connected to the first Station Rack
two of the four antennas normally connected to the second Station Rack
one of the two antennas normally connected to the third Station Rack
Further, we MUST populate all of the first rack before moving on to the
second, and so forth. So with 7 antennas we'll use two of the four in
Rack 1 and two of the three in Rack 2, for dual pol'n work.
* We would like a wide range of baselines, both for WIDAR-0 testing
(a range of delays and rates) and for imaging purposes.
* We would like to include a number of the new receiver bands, to allow
testing their wideband performance.
* While we may change this antenna allocation occasionally, we should
not do so very often. Perhaps Kerry, Doug, or Steven can comment on
how often "not very" should be -- I'm thinking 1-2 months between any
such re-wiring (re-fibering?).
With these constraints I propose the following:
Station Rack 1: ea19 (W04)
ea05e (E12)
ea02e (E20; KaC)
ea09e (E24; KaC)
Station Rack 2: ea28e (N08; KaSC)
ea25 (N24; Ka)
ea24 (W32; KaC)
ea01 (W16; Ka) when we're ready for 8 antennas
Station Rack 3: ea18 (N16) when we're ready for 9 antennas
ea23 (E36) if & when we're ready for 10 antennas
appended e ==> ready for 3-bit samplers
Ka ==> equipped with Ka band receiver
S ==> equipped with S band receiver
L ==> equipped with "EVLA compliant" L-band receiver (OMT)
C ==> equipped with "EVLA compliant" C-band receiver (OMT)
So with 7 antennas we'll have:
4 ready for 3-bit samplers
5 with Ka-band receivers
4 with EVLA-compliant C-band receivers
and a range of baselines on each arm. I didn't worry about L-band for now
since that would be yet another antenna on the east arm (ea14 at E28).
In graphical form:
N28 ea13
6 N24 ea25; Ka
N20 ea26
9 N16 ea18
5 N08 ea28e; KaSC
1 W04 ea19 E04 ea11
MP ea15e; C
W12 ea17 2 E12 ea05e
8 W16 ea01; Ka E16 ea03e; KaC
W20 ea16 3 E20 ea02e; KaC
4 E24 ea09e; KaC
W28 ea04; Ka E28 ea14; L
7 W32 ea24; KaC E32 ea21; C
10 E36 ea23
preceding number --> WIDAR-0 antenna
1- 4 are in Station Rack 1
5- 8 are in Station Rack 2
9-10 are in Station Rack 3
Please send any comments to me as soon as possible, so the fiber folks
can plan their work. Brent will be plugging in boards at the site
early Monday morning, and we want to be ready for him!
-- Michael
More information about the evlatests
mailing list