[evlatests] 12.5 MHz BW spectral line mode noise
Bryan Butler
bbutler at nrao.edu
Tue Jun 3 18:47:57 EDT 2008
if this is in file 342APEVLA, then i can verify that the command to turn
off self test was in the script:
VlaCorrelator.selftestEnable(0)
-bryan
Rick Perley wrote:
> All is *not* well with these modes. To test if turning off the
> self-test has 'fixed' the extra-noise problem, I observed a blank field
> in C-band, in continuum mode, and in mode 'PA' with BW = 25, 12.5, and
> 6.25 MHz. The data were calibrated using 3C147. The channelwidths
> provided are 3.125, 0.781, and 0.195 MHz.
> Data quality was excellent -- even outstanding -- for all
> observations. The only complaint (other than 5B, which is already
> fixed) is with the 'short shallow drop' problem, which affects most EVLA
> antennas (but with negligible effect on sensitivity).
>
> Noise histograms were made of the imaginary part of the Stokes I, Q,
> U, and V correlations of the noise field for the EVLA antennas. In all
> cases, the width of I equaled that of V, and Q equaled that in U. All
> four should have equal width, but as the table below shows, they do
> not. The values given are in mJy.
>
> BW I, V Q, U
> Comment
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 50 MHz 17.0 16.8 Actual
> BW ~ 44 MHz
> 3.125 60.0 60.0
> Exactly as expected
> 0.781 200.0 130.0 Q, U
> are correct. I, V are 50% too high.
> 0.195 250 255
> Exactly as expected.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I can't confirm if the 'self-test' was actually off. But if it was, we
> still have a problem with extra noise in Stokes I and V (actually, in
> the correlations RR and LL).
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
More information about the evlatests
mailing list