[evlatests] Good P-band news

[Ken Sowinski]

On Thu, 17 Jan 2008, Rick Perley wrote:

>    B) Poor sensitivity from:  19A and 19C,  18B.  (Sensitivity reduced
> by factor of about 5).  Very poor sensitivity from 23B (reduced by a
> factor of about 100).   The first observation showed very poor
> sensitivity in 26B (low by a factor of ~100), but normal sensitivity
> returned for the 2nd scan.  For these IFs, the data were flagged as good.
>
>    C)  19B was flagged as bad, but the data showed normal sensitivity
> and stability.

18B and three if the IFs of 19 never quite recovered from all
the work done yesterday and remained bad at all bands at the
end of the day.  I trust they will get fixed today.