[evlatests] Single dish vlbi

[Craig Walker]

The autocorrelations might be quite useful for diagnostic purposes.  Is 
there any harm in keeping them?

Cheers,

Craig


Walter Brisken wrote:
>>> Spectral line did not work.  I suspect it was the correlator controler
>>> that got unhappy, since idcaf said 'no visibility data received'.
>> Not too surprising.  I will be back next week and will work with
>> Walter to be sure that the correlator controller and idcaf are
>> thinking the same way about this.
> 
> It is the reception of data from the correlator that clocks out the idcaf 
> records.  Had there been a non-trivial second sub-array, idcaf would 
> probably have gotten the data it expected and no complaint would have come 
> out.  I can change the write trigger in cases where records without data 
> are requested.
> 
> For 1 antenna subarrays I'd be tempted to just write out records that have 
> four zero length CDAs -- is this legal?  I don't think there is any need 
> for the autocorrelations, or is there?
> 
> These are easy issues to address, but as Ken says we should probably 
> communicate with each other first to make sure we all know what to expect.
> 
> -W
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
     R. Craig Walker            Array Operations Center
     cwalker at nrao.edu           National Radio Astronomy Observatory
     Phone  505 835 7247        P. O. Box O
     Fax    505 835 7027        Socorro NM 87801   USA
---------------------------------------------------------------------