[evlatests] Even more interesting results

[Robert Hayward]

Antenna 17 does indeed have a C-Band. Serial Number 7 was installed 
around Feb 16th when we weren't allowed access to Ant 26 or 23.

The current Summary sheet doesn't show it as being installed but those 
from the previous weeks do correctly show the situation. Something most 
of got buggered up in the most recent update.

-Bob


Rick Perley wrote:
> The prior two reports came from X-band, continuum data.  There were also 
> spectral line data (mode 1A, 12 MHz BW).
> 
>     At C-band, antennas 3, 7, 23 and 26 were dead.  The latter two are 
> known to have no C-band receivers.  Interestingly, antenna 17, which 
> according to the EVLA Project Summary sheet has no receiver, fringed 
> beautifully. 
> 
>     Very large delay errors are seen on antennas 9, 14, 22, and 28.  The 
> large delay error in 14 is not sufficient to explain the low amplitude 
> -- the antenna is truly weak in this IF, at least. 
> 
>     The amplitude drops, noted in continuum, are present in this dataset 
> as well. 
> 
>    
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
> 
>