[evlatests] "pulsing" explanation

Ken Sowinski ksowinsk at nrao.edu
Tue Jun 26 22:11:18 EDT 2007


On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Ken Sowinski wrote:

> 1.  A change was made to the vxWorks half of the CMP which
> made it more prone to lose track of time.
>
> 2.  A change was made to the executor which as a side effect
> caused the CMP synchronizing command to be sent only once
> per executor execution rather than once at the beginning of
> each script.

Further relection leads me to suggest that 1. is less important
and what did us in was rebooting the CMP and not getting it
properly synchronized because of 2.




More information about the evlatests mailing list