[evlatests] mosaicking, modcomp-free
Gustaaf van Moorsel
gvanmoor at nrao.edu
Fri Jun 22 11:19:41 EDT 2007
I ran the following test twice:
1 - 1 scan on a strong calibrator
2 - 1 mosaicking scan on that same calibrator, mode RSL
3 - 1 mosaicking scan on that same calibrator, regular mode
first in Modcomp-free mode, then in Modcomp mode.
Results for the Modcomp-free mode:
1 - In the first scan, only useless (low amplitude but unflagged) data
on all baselines involving a VLA antenna. This in spite of the fact
that the scan duration is 8 minutes
2 - In the first scan, for EVLA - EVLA baselines, there were useful data
but it took 4 minutes to start producing them. During the first 4
minutes there were similar low-amplitude data as on VLA baselines
during the whole scan
3 - Unlike under Modcomp control, no special source names are created for
each of the pointings within a scan. Aips will assign different names
if it sees different pointing positions, but it cannot tell the source
in the first (non-mosaic) scan apart from the first pointing on that
source in the mosaic scan
4 - Whereas under Modcomp control scan 3 (mosaicking scan 2) starts on
the calibrator, as it should, in Modcomp-free mode it continues
moving away from the calibrator. In other words, in Modcomp-free
mode the beginning pointing of scan 3 is the final pointing of scan 2
5 - There are minor differences in the actual pointing positions among
the samples in the mosaicking scan, suggesting a different algorithm
is being used. I don't know how serious this is, but it may be worth
investigating.
Gustaaf
More information about the evlatests
mailing list