[evlatests] UVW fixed; new archive revision number
Ed Fomalont
efomalon at nrao.edu
Thu Jul 5 15:51:00 EDT 2007
Hi Walter,
Thanks for the fix. A related three part question. People often
run UVFIX anyway (not for the sign problem over the last few days) to 1)
correct for the old VLA time error of 0.5 sample; 2) increase the
accuracy of the u,v,w that are computed by the on-line system; 3)
correct for the field stretching associated with annual aberration. Are
any or all of these previous minor 'errors' now corrected with the
on-line uvw and times by mod-comp free, or should UVFIX be run for the
wide-field high-precision work anyway?
Ed
More information about the evlatests
mailing list