[evlatests] Terminology

[Rob Long]

 From a hardware standpoint, IFs A, B, C, D are fairly entrenched in 
everyone's thinking.  Adding E, F, G, H for the hi-speed digitizers 
would be fairly painless.  On the other hand, whatever makes most sense 
from a software standpoint just means (gulp!) tweeking our way of thinking.

Just my 2 cents,
Rob

Barry Clark wrote:
> I'm starting to think about code to drive the 4 GHz samplers.  In order 
> that the comments in my code bear some relation to what we eventually
> end up calling things, I'd like to talk about terminology now.
> 
> My suggestion is that the first output from the T304s, be called
> basebands A, B, C, D, as they are now, ignoring the fact that they
> have different filters and samplers selected.
> 
> Let's call the second outputs from the T304s basebands E, F, G, H.
> 
> So the baseband pairs are AC, BD, EG, FH.
> 
> Another alternative is to assign nunbers to the baseband pairs, a la
> AIPS, so the basebands become 1R, 1L, 2R, 2L, 3R, 3L, 4R, 4L.  (Which
> T304 baseband 2R comes from TBD.)  I think this is more confusing 
> because we seem to have settled on numbering the subbands, so subbands
> would be things like 101R, 101L, 102R, 201R, etc. which I find less
> euphonious than A01, C01, A02, B01, etc.
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests