[evlatests] EVLA Bandpass Stability

Rick Perley rperley at nrao.edu
Wed Nov 1 18:59:58 EST 2006


    The data referred to in the last report were analyzed for its 
bandpass stability characteristics. 

    Summary:

    The ~4 MHz ripple which is the dominant source of bandpass 
instability for VLA antennas is completely absent in EVLA antennas  (as 
expected).  The stability of EVLA bandpasses, over frequency scales of a 
few MHz, on time scales of tens of minutes, is about 0.1% in amplitude, 
and 0.1 degrees in phase (pk - pk) -- a factor ~20 larger than the PB 
requirements.  However, when the 4 MHz ripple present in the VLA 
antennas is removed through careful calibration, the residual stability 
for VLA antennas is found to be the same as the  EVLA antennas, leaving 
open the possibility the instability origin is within electronics common 
to the two systems.  The WIDAR prototype correlator will be needed to 
make significant further progress on this requirement. 

    Details:

    The PB requirements call for a bandpass stability of 1e-4 in power, 
and 0.006 degrees, over timescales of an hour, and on frequency scales 
less than the RF frequency/1000.  For X-band, this frequency scale is ~8 
MHz.  To explore our current stability, I observed a strong source with 
a BW of 25 MHz, and channel resolution of 0.8 MHz, for 4.5 hours. 

    The variations in the bandpass are what interest us, so I removed 
the fundamental bandpass shape by finding the mean bandpass shape for 
the entire 4.5 hour run.  The AIPS program BPASS was then applied to 
find the time variation of the bandpass w.r.t. this mean. 

    The results clearly show the dominant VLA 4 MHz ripple.  Its 
characteristics are:

    1) Frequency scale is close to 4.0 MHz. 
    2) The amplitude of the ripple varies widely between VLA antennas -- 
pk-pk ripple maximum is about 1.5% on antennas 1 and 12, but nearly 
invisible on others, where the amplitude is at least a factor of 5 less.
    3) The phase scale is maximum of about 1 degree on antennas 1 and 
12, less on others. 
    4) The pattern changes amplitude in time -- inverting its amplitude 
and phase with a period of about 2 hours.  The frequency of max and min 
did not change in this experiment, but in a previous one (done with 12 
MHz BW), the peaks/troughs clearly moved in time. 

    The amplitude and phase changes for EVLA antennas are clearly much 
better, with no sign of the ripple.  The bandpasses computed once every 
30 minutes show variations with a maximum amplitude of 0.1%, and phase 
excursions of about 0.1 degree -- about 20 times too high (if the PB 
requirements are interpreted as peak-peak, rather than some sort of rms 
over a good part of the spectrum). 
    The structure of the EVLA Bandpass variations is quite different 
than the 4 MHz ripple.  They are typically on a much longer frequency 
scale -- ~15 MHz seems dominant, but scales down to a few MHz are also 
visible. 

    The PB requirements state that the variations are to be determined 
over an hourly timescale -- this presumes that the observer who wants 
super-accurate determinations of weak absorption or emission will 
calibrate on a strong bandpass source on that timescale.  To mimic the 
effect of this, I formed a bandpass solution on an hourly interval, then 
determined the differential bandpass after interpolating the hourly 
solution. 
    The result of this procedure was that the VLA ripple nearly 
disappeared, and the resultant spectral shapes have the same shape and 
variations as the EVLA bandpasses (either with or without the hourly 
solutions). 

    The similarity of the bandpass variations between the EVLA and VLA, 
after  hourly calibration has removed the dominant VLA ripple, suggests 
a common origin.  This could be the receiver itself, or in the backend 
analog electronics.    We'll have to await the WIDAR prototype 
correlator to be able to make further progress (unless somebody can 
think of a better test). 



More information about the evlatests mailing list