[evlatests] AB1204 5/6mar06

[Bryan Butler]

yeah, definitely worth testing.  though i'm pretty sure we had tested 
interleaving fast switching scans with normal ones, i'm sure the tests were not 
particularly exhaustive.  i just looked at the python function for fast 
switching ('nod.py' for anybody that cares) and nothing leaps out at me as being 
obviously a problem, though.

	-bryan


On 3/6/06 11:50, Michael Rupen wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Ken Sowinski wrote:
> 
>> The interesting correlation I see in your table is
>> that almost all evla failures are scans that follow
>> a fast switching scan.
> 
> 
> Hmm, good point.  And that occurs rather less often (in most folks' files)
> than band changes, which may be by AB1204 picked this up.  My impression
> is that very few people mix fs and regular scans, at least in standard 
> tests.
> For AR570 I tend to use fs for everything EXCEPT L band and flux 
> calibration
> (though both of these "normal" type scans often occur right after fs scans,
> though maybe not at X band)  so it's possible I've missed  this.  Worth 
> a few
> tests...
> 
>              -- Michael
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests