[evlatests] antenna 24, C band
Rob Long
rlong at nrao.edu
Mon Jul 31 10:15:49 EDT 2006
I assumed that this email was referring to ant 18. I need to look into
the specs on the optical mux that we installed vs the one I removed.
The only difference (besides the 1 meter patch cables) is the different mux.
Rob
Ken Sowinski wrote:
> The C band recevier was installed yesterday and was shown
> to work today. Delays and focus were set. The F317 is
> jury rigged and the noise tubes are not switching yet.
> As was reported elsewhere the T5 for IF D was broken,
> it added a large constant to the SD measurement, and
> was replaced.
>
> The work yesterday to prepare for the receiver installation
> had an interesting effect on delays. There is a progression
> of about 40 ns more path length for each IF going from IF D
> to IF A. e.g.,
> A -120
> B -80
> C -40
> D 0
> If it is true that each IF is at a higher (or lower)
> wavelength in the fiber then it behaves like a highly
> dispersive element has been added to the optical path.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests
More information about the evlatests
mailing list