[evlatests] EVLA status as seen by the observer: midnight last night (6-7jul06)
mrupen at nrao.edu
mrupen at nrao.edu
Fri Jul 7 12:37:14 EDT 2006
AM865 7jul06 05:00-06:00 IAT
------------------------------
M. Rupen 7jul06
Report of data quality (as measured by AIPS weights)
EVLA ant. 13,14,16,18 included
Standard continuum, C X bands
3.3s averaging
elevation 35-45 degrees
OVERVIEW (comparisons are to 3jul06 data):
6cm:
ant. 13 remains excellent
ant. 14 has gotten MUCH worse: no data in IFs AC, very high
noise in IFs BD
ant. 16 has also gone waaaay downhill -- much worse noise in all IFs --
IFs AC are now the worst in the array, while BD went from among the best
in the array to about the middle of the pack.
IFs AC show quite unstable amplitudes -- gains vary chaotically,
by 20%, over an hour
ant. 18 has no data
4cm:
ant. 13 has gotten much worse in all IFs (dropped from about average to
much worse than most VLA antennas)
ant. 14 is about the same (awful)
ant. 16 has also gotten much worse -- it's now almost as bad as 14
ant. 18 remains about the same (poor)
IFs BD show dropouts (low amp., stable phase) at the same time
in each IF (but note 3.3s averaging time)
-------------------------------------------------------------
AIPS weights: median ranking, out of a nominal
26 antennas
--> 1 is the best; 26 is the worst <--
6cm 4cm
13-A n.f. 23 **sig.drop from middle
13-C ---- 24 **sig.drop from middle
13-B 1 23 **sig.drop from middle
13-D 2 24 **sig.drop from lower quartile
14-A ---- 26
14-C ---- 23
14-B 26 26
14-D 26 26
16-A 26 25 **sig.drop from lowest quartile
16-C 26 25 **sig.drop from lowest quartile
16-B 9 25 **sig.drop from lowest quartile
16-D 18 25 **even worse than before
18-A ---- 17
18-C ---- 19
18-B ---- 17
18-D ---- 20
---- ==> no data
n.f. ==> no fringes (low amp, random phase)
-------------------------------------------------------------
AIPS weights: median fractional weight
mean weight is calculated for each record
fractional weight is the weight for the EVLA antenna,
divided by that mean
the median fractional weight is the median value of the
fractional weights, derived from the distribution across
all records in which the antenna was present
--> high is good <---
--> the average VLA antenna is 1.0 <--
--> 0.1 is 10 times worse than the average;
10.0 is 10 times better <--
6cm 4cm
13-A n.f. 0.51
13-C ---- 0.50
13-B 1.71 0.56
13-D 1.39 0.51
14-A ---- 0.02
14-C ---- 0.002
14-B 0.04 0.02
14-D 0.03 0.02
16-A 0.46 0.03
16-C 0.36 0.03
16-B 1.11 0.03
16-D 0.89 0.03
18-A ---- 0.91
18-C ---- 0.80
18-B ---- 0.83
18-D ---- 0.74
---- ==> no data
n.f. ==> no fringes (low amp, random phase)
-------------------------------------------------------------
=======================================================================
=======================================================================
More information about the evlatests
mailing list