[evlatests] New EVLA Holography Phenomenon

Bryan Butler bbutler at nrao.edu
Wed Aug 30 23:16:30 EDT 2006


i know that walter messed around with timing at the end of holography scans (to 
fix the problem where it continued to do the raster when it should have gone on 
to the next scan).

so, when walter gets back from his travels, perhaps he can have a look...



On 8/30/06 14:10, Rick Perley wrote:
>     Two tests were run yesterday, to confirm speculations about the 
> origin of the various phase problems previous reported.  The results of 
> these tests on this subject will be reported later. 
> 
>     The purpose of this note is to record a remarkable 'new' phenomenon, 
> which affects *only* affects amplitudes. 
> 
>     Both of yesterday's tests consisted of three short holography 
> (beam-scanning) blocks, each of which ended with a standard calibrator 
> observation.  It was noted for all three blocks, on both tests, for all 
> four EVLA antennas, in all IFs, that the visibility amplitude at the 
> beginning of the concluding calibrator scan was low by a factor of ~1.6 
> for 21 seconds, then jumped to the appropriate full amplitude in a 
> timescale of less than 1 second. 
>     The phenomenon is completely absent in the VLA antennas. 
>     There is absolutely no phase change across the boundary. 
> 
>     Ken pointed out that the Tsys correction in the 'fast solar' mode 
> that we use for these tests (0.41 seconds averaging time) has no 
> smoothing applied, placing suspicion on the Tsys mechanism.  But the 
> Tsys values are stable throughout.   So this is not the explanation. 
>   
>     Upon closer inspection, it is clear that the jump in amplitudes is 
> not discontinuous.  Indeed, the first 417 msec integration, in all 96 
> measured instances shows an amplitude 1/3 of the way up between the low 
> and high state, and the 2nd integration, 833 msec after the transition, 
> is at the bottom edge of the noise distribution of the full-strength 
> values.  This is (just) compatible with antenna slew motion speeds.  The 
> movement was in elevation -- 20 degrees/minute, or 20 
> arcminutes/second.  The observed low amplitudes at the beginning of the 
> scan are indeed exactly the same as the last  holography amplitude -- 
> located at about the half power point, or 15 arcminutes off axis. 
> 
>     We thus hypothesize that this effect is due to the EVLA antennas 
> being told to move back to the calibrator, after the end of the last 
> holographic scan,  21 seconds later than they should have been told. 
>     It is interesting to note that this delay does not show up on the 
> sequential holography scans. 
> 
>     This is no big deal -- it doesn't affect the actual holography data, 
> and is easily removed from the calibrator data, which always lasts 
> longer than 20 seconds.  But it perhaps indicates some remaining subtle 
> timing issues, which would be good to resolve. 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evlatests mailing list
> evlatests at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evlatests



More information about the evlatests mailing list