[evlatests] New EVLA Holography Phenomenon
Rick Perley
rperley at nrao.edu
Wed Aug 30 16:10:17 EDT 2006
Two tests were run yesterday, to confirm speculations about the
origin of the various phase problems previous reported. The results of
these tests on this subject will be reported later.
The purpose of this note is to record a remarkable 'new' phenomenon,
which affects *only* affects amplitudes.
Both of yesterday's tests consisted of three short holography
(beam-scanning) blocks, each of which ended with a standard calibrator
observation. It was noted for all three blocks, on both tests, for all
four EVLA antennas, in all IFs, that the visibility amplitude at the
beginning of the concluding calibrator scan was low by a factor of ~1.6
for 21 seconds, then jumped to the appropriate full amplitude in a
timescale of less than 1 second.
The phenomenon is completely absent in the VLA antennas.
There is absolutely no phase change across the boundary.
Ken pointed out that the Tsys correction in the 'fast solar' mode
that we use for these tests (0.41 seconds averaging time) has no
smoothing applied, placing suspicion on the Tsys mechanism. But the
Tsys values are stable throughout. So this is not the explanation.
Upon closer inspection, it is clear that the jump in amplitudes is
not discontinuous. Indeed, the first 417 msec integration, in all 96
measured instances shows an amplitude 1/3 of the way up between the low
and high state, and the 2nd integration, 833 msec after the transition,
is at the bottom edge of the noise distribution of the full-strength
values. This is (just) compatible with antenna slew motion speeds. The
movement was in elevation -- 20 degrees/minute, or 20
arcminutes/second. The observed low amplitudes at the beginning of the
scan are indeed exactly the same as the last holography amplitude --
located at about the half power point, or 15 arcminutes off axis.
We thus hypothesize that this effect is due to the EVLA antennas
being told to move back to the calibrator, after the end of the last
holographic scan, 21 seconds later than they should have been told.
It is interesting to note that this delay does not show up on the
sequential holography scans.
This is no big deal -- it doesn't affect the actual holography data,
and is easily removed from the calibrator data, which always lasts
longer than 20 seconds. But it perhaps indicates some remaining subtle
timing issues, which would be good to resolve.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list