[evlatests] L352 RTP meters update.
Vivek Dhawan
vdhawan at nrao.edu
Fri Aug 25 19:35:35 EDT 2006
Summary and question:
We have many weeks of field tests, and a few days of lab tests. So I
think we should go back to lab testing of the newest meters before we
buy in bulk. Opinions?
The pros and cons are:
Evaluating the meters in the field is difficult, because the antenna
environment is not well controlled. The interferometer phase variation
contains effects not measured by the RTP meters, and so cannot be used
to verify them.
However, we want the whole system to work in the field. So finding the
limits, set by components inside or outside the meters, is important
in the long run.
------------------------------------
On Aug 10th there was a baseline run that I examined in detail. I am
trying to write clearly, believe it or not.
1. As previously noted, the L352's register daily changes of about
50ps from the temperature response of the fiber. In addition, there
are shorter variations of a few ps in meter reading, that may or may
not be real changes in fiber delay.
2. The interferometer phases show large variations with elevation, (at
some antennas), separate from the diurnal fiber change, and over 10
times larger than explained by the RTP meter readings.
3. It turns out the airhandlers were cycling the temperature by
several degrees, in a ~30min cycle, and then stopped doing it just as
the baseline run began. So I could see the separate effects of
temperature and elevation. The RTP meters change by +_1 ps, as the
rack temp varies (+-0.5C to +-2C, depending on location within rack),
OR the elevation changes (8 to 120deg).
4. The temperature of some modules (monitored by the MIBs) changes as
the antenna is tipped in elevation, probably from changes in airflow.
However, the many temperature monitors installed in the EA13 rack by
Doug Gerrard show little change with elevation.
5. The 2 RTP meters both monitoring EA16 agree, i.e., their difference
is well within spec, for many hours at a time, BUT they diverge from
each other a few times a day, rapidly over ~10min, sometimes by
several ps. This is out of spec. The cause is not understood, but 2
possible causes can be eliminated:
The temperature of the L352 units themselves is probably NOT a
cause, since the other 2 units for EA13, 14, are in the same rack
in the control building, but have a different pattern from 16a,b.
The readings of 16a,b change with elevation but agree with each
other at all elevations in the baseline run.
6. To check if the RTP meter difference follows the rack temperature,
we could move the temperature logging to EA16 from 13.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor point Variation Varies with or Comments
or Variable +- is caused by
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Interferometer +-50 psec Elevation/Temp EA13: +_50ps
phase etc, ? EA14,24: > +_50ps
EA18,16: < +_5.ps
Rack air temp +-0.5 C to Does NOT change Various log points.
EA13: Doug +_2 C with elevation
Gerrard's data ( < 0.2 C)
F320 module +_2 C Changes w. ELEV.
temperature NOT with rack temp.
L305 Analog +_1 C Changes w. ELEV.
board temp. NOT with rack temp.
L352 RTP +_1 ps Changes with ELEV. (After large diurnal
reading ALSO w. rack temp. trends from the fiber
itself are removed)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vivek.
More information about the evlatests
mailing list