[evla-sw-discuss] SPAM

[Kevin Ryan]

Thanks James,

I guess I'm more curious as to why I am seeing them. I should not be  
subscribed to their multicast - unless by mistake.  I'm under the  
understanding that these packets should be blocked at the switch  
before reaching my computer n'est pas?





On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:32 AM, James Robnett wrote:

>
>
>      That would be Keith Morris et al's phase stability
> test setup ...  the nearest drop was subnet-2.   It
> never occured to me that they'd be generating sufficient
> packets to be a problem.
>
>       I wouuldn't think they were broadcasting so it's
> not clear to me why your recieving them.   If it's multicast
> and  you're subscribed then you'd get them no matter
> what network they're on.
>
>       Just trying to figure out whether the problem is
> a) They're on subnet-2 (in which case we move them)
> b) They're talking too much (in which case we tell them
>       to dial it back)
> c)  It's just suprising (in which case it's not any more)
>
> james
>
> On Sep 6, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Kevin Ryan wrote:
>
>> I'm getting bombarded with UDP packets from 146.88.2.246 containing
>> EVLA monitor data.
>>
>> Kevin
>> _______________________________________________
>> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
>> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
>> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> evla-sw-discuss mailing list
> evla-sw-discuss at listmgr.cv.nrao.edu
> http://listmgr.cv.nrao.edu/mailman/listinfo/evla-sw-discuss