[daip] [!16519]: AIPS - Issues with UF002BC & UF002BD

Eric Greisen nraohelp at nrao.edu
Mon Jul 20 11:20:07 EDT 2020


Eric Greisen updated #16519
---------------------------

Issues with UF002BC & UF002BD
---------------------------------

           Ticket ID: 16519
                 URL: https://help.nrao.edu/staff/index.php?/Tickets/Ticket/View/16519
                Name: Luis Fernandez
       Email address: lfernan at gmu.edu
             Creator: User
          Department: AIPS Data Reduction
       Staff (Owner): Eric Greisen
                Type: Issue
              Status: Open
            Priority: Default
                 SLA: NRAO E2E
      Template group: Default
             Created: 10 July 2020 07:50 AM
             Updated: 20 July 2020 08:20 AM
           Reply due: 22 July 2020 05:54 AM (1d 21h 33m)
      Resolution due: 11 April 2023 05:00 PM (995d 8h 40m)

It is hard to see the TY table values when the plot scales are dominated by Kilo Kelvin points.  Those points need to edited away or the plot scale controlled by PIXRANGE.  I cannot see what the cause may be.  How are you measuring the fluxes?  If it is by making an image (IMAGR) then unstable phases could reduce the apparent flux substantially.  IF 4 should not leak into the other IFs and whatever is going on is affecting your calibrators more or less equally with your targets.  I am surprised by the ACCOR amplitudes - with the VLBA the gains should not by so far away from 1.0 in both the bad session and the good session.
Eric Greisen


------------------------------------------------------
Staff CP:  https://help.nrao.edu/staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listmgr.nrao.edu/pipermail/daip/attachments/20200720/ad3f1e56/attachment.html>


More information about the Daip mailing list